Saturday, 23 August 2008

Clarence Mitchell: Sophisticated PR Guru or Just a Stupid Twat?

Is this it, is this where we are now at, has the death of Madeleine McCann and the disposal of her body by those nearest to her degenerated from pantomime to circus to repugnant farce?

When a spokesman hired to protect the prime suspects in the death and disappearance of Madeleine McCann, to denigrate the facts, to confuse and to shamelessly lie in furthering that protection.

When that same "spokesman" for suspects, a hitherto unknown and unique component in what is not just a case of child neglect but given the hiding of the corpse of Madeleine must surely be a case of culpable homicide.

When, added to these factors the inclusion of the "possibility" of Madeleine being held by Romanies and, despite all the evidence to the contrary, that "There is no suggestion she has been harmed or killed," then yes, this case has decayed beyond repugnant to reach contemptible, sordid and, like the McCanns but much more so Mitchell, vile, disgustingly vile.

You know she's dead, you know her parents are culpable and you know that I and thousands like me know that you know.

Clarence Mitchell, you are without shame.

"There is no suggestion she has been harmed or killed," says Clarence Mitchell. "They believe she has been hidden somewhere. It could be a Romany family who have taken her. It's unusual but not completely rare. As long as there is money in the find to pay for investigators, the investigation will continue. If and when it runs out, there are ways to bring more money in."

Woman's Own article.


Madeleine's parents face new agony after detectives mistakes are revealed.
No one can fail to be moved by new revelations of information that was withheld from Kate and Gerry McCann in the search for missing Maddie.

Possible sightings, e-fits of two suspects, CCTV pictures and information that a paedophile ring may have ordered the abduction have been brought to light.

And now the couple may be planning to sue Portuguese police for any mistakes they might have made during the investigation.

Family spokesperson, Clarence Mitchell, tells Woman's Own, "The mistakes and incompetence are there for all to see. If they'd done a lot more in the first few days after Madeleine went missing, then there would have been a better chance of getting her back."

The move was revealed as the McCanns team of private investigators were following up a new sightings of Maddie- a security guard in Brussels, Belgium, is convinced he saw her with a woman in a hijab headdress just days ago. While the McCanns priority is still to get Maddie back, their legal team in Portugal are seeing if there are grounds for a lawsuit.

But this renewed investigation comes at a time when the McCanns are running low on cash. There's just £460,000 left in the Find Madeleine fund, and with the investigation reported to be costing £166,000 per months, they're running out of the money needed to find their little girl.

But members of the public, desperate to return Madeleine to her parents, have got into trouble taking pictures of children whom they suspect may be Maddie. The McCanns are now urging people not to take photos of children without the consent of their parents, but to report any suspicions to the police immediately.

The recent reports of possible new sightings have further convinced the McCanns that their daughter is still alive and unharmed, playing down claims that she may have been snatched by a paedophile ring.

"There is no suggestion she has been harmed or killed," says Clarence Mitchell. "They believe she has been hidden somewhere. It could be a Romany family who have taken her. It's unusual but not completely rare. As long as there is money in the find to pay for investigators, the investigation will continue. If and when it runs out, there are ways to bring more money in."

h/t "Princess Leia" for the transcript.

Monday, 18 August 2008

Write On This. Madeleine Won't Be Needing It Anymore

Deary deary me, this is one that I don't need to spell out, stroll on!

Hours after the disappearance of the little English girl, the McCanns used the covers of children’s story books that belonged to their daughter, to write down details of the evening.

Hours after Madeleine disappeared, the English girl’s parents tore the covers of two children’s books that the child enjoyed leafing through before going to sleep, to write down the details of the evening of the disappearance. more Joana Morais

Thursday, 14 August 2008

Clarence Mitchell Whore

I have had about as much as I can take this last twenty four hours watching this cocksucker spew his lies and bullshit.

The only thing that has saved me needing a new monitor is the fact that when this obscenity is over the self same video clips that I have had to endure as this whore vomits his disgusting bile is that they will be there for posterity and will be an non-erasable testament to the antics of this piece of shit.

There is a dead child
in all this that seems to have been forgotten.

Common Sense

A small extract from Paulo Reis regarding the Tapas Seven and the reconstruction.

About the reenactment, the main problem of the Tapas group was clear: either PJ believed in their statements and the reenactment wasn't necessary, or PJ was trying to get something strange out from that. They wanted to know what were the real intentions of PJ. After a lot of emails were exchanged, through Stuart Prior, the Tapas group remain unconvinced of the utility of such reenactment.


The next answers from the McCann friends put as conditions not only the lifting of the status of "arguidos" of the McCann couple but also a public statement from PJ dispelling the lies churned out by the Portuguese Press and stressing that there were no suspicions over the seven friends. more

And here is a comment I saved to file purely for the common sense it displayed. From poster quark1 on the 3As. Emphasis mine.

I agree xxxxxxx, that if these statements were taken on in May, and Katerina and Arul are telling the truth of what they saw, then it does implicate the whole group! It is 'the whole goup' who have kept totally silent and invisible for 15 long months....even though a little 3 yr old has probably lost her life.

Does anyone think that these people would have kept so silent and invisible if a real abduction had taken place? If things had been exactly as the McCanns said? That Maddie was left there, safe in her bed, and someone went in and abducted her? Do you think the Tapas lot would have taken such huge pains to disappear from view in that case?

No, they would have been doing what normal friends would do in that pictured all over the place supporting the devastated parents, be speaking out at the fund-raising balloon releases, be at any reconstruction the PJ wanted to do.

Thats what normal friends of innocent parents would do.

But these Tapas lot.....they have slunk away and hidden under stones!

They are all in on it IMO. Every last one of them.

Can't argue with that.

Jane Tanner: Liar

I would like, with the aid of the newly released sketches, to put together as simply as I can a short article that exposes the lies of Jane Tanner and the corner stone of lies that the "abduction" was built on.

I suppose I could be succinct and say: No jemmied shutters - no abduction.

You may think this a simple statement from an even simpler fellow but the shutters are the fundamental corner stone that the McCanns built their abduction theory on.

The basic premiss of the McCanns being, when asked why they were so sure there had been an abduction and Madeleine had not just wandered off, "The window was open and the shutters jemmied."

But if we remove the jemmied shutters from the equation what then becomes the basis for any abduction?

The moment that the shutters were shown not to have been tampered with should have been the moment that handcuffs were produced and the McCanns carted off to the Portimao nick, alas, as we are all aware, that never happened.

You might think given all the recent revelations that I could find other things to write about, maybe so, but there are still plenty of folks that are not surprisingly confused about the events of the third of May or more incredibly actually believe Jane Tanners account.

I myself have always laboured under the misapprehension that Gerry McCann and Jeremy Wilkins were stood having there little tĂȘte-a-tĂȘte on the opposite side of the road from Tanner's route, as we shall see from Tanners own words this was not the case which lends even more incredulity to her story.

So let us first take a look at the building plan of apartment 5A.
I have for clarity turned the plan through one hundred and eighty degrees and re-labeled it and the re-labeling of Tanner's sketch again is only for clarity.

Next up is a composite of the street and a squashed version of the apartment building plan.

And lastly Tanner's sketch that I have re-labeled for clarity and on which I have superimposed the plan of 5A.

What we know for fact:

Contrary to initial claims (later recanted) by the McCanns that the front door was left unlocked it was in fact locked and was not used by the McCanns for fear of waking the children.

Forensics have disproved that the shutters were tampered with and equally disproved that no one exited through the window let alone someone carrying Madeleine, in fact the only fingerprint on the window/shutter was Kate McCanns.

This then leaves the unlocked patio door, admittedly left open by the McCanns.

Now here lies the problem with this little tale, the "abductor" neither entered nor left the apartment via the locked front door or the shuttered window, an impossibility.

Therefore any access by said abductor must have been through the patio door, but more importantly the patio door was the only point that an abductor could exit 5A.

If we go back and look at Tanner's sketch how then did the abductor exit the apartment through the patio door with McCann and Wilkins stood where they were and miraculously appear walking across the top of road from point five to point eight?

The answer therefore is quite obvious, he didn't, it's quite impossible, Jane Tanner is, like the rest of this sorry bunch, an out and out liar.

The whole thing is a crocc.

Not the most sensational of articles I admit, but hopefully it may go some way to clarifying any confusion that some might have had.

Wednesday, 13 August 2008

A Little Nonsense

You will probably need to be an American to fully appreciate this one.