Showing posts with label McCann Gerry. Show all posts
Showing posts with label McCann Gerry. Show all posts

Monday, 9 January 2012

Did Jim Gamble Sanitize Gerry McCann's CATS File 19309?

Because if he did, it would certainly be in keeping with all the other anomalous behaviour exhibited by Jim Gamble regarding Arguido, Gerry McCann. (See Jim Gamble tag)




This topic of discussion is far from new, though no less important for being that, but it is doing the rounds currently on Twitter. Much of it revolves around this claim by a certain 'KaOssis.' Posted verbatim.

Gerry McCann was convicted for child sex abuses in 2002, althought the evidence has been hacked and emptied from the case file by someone who has access to the National Sex Offenders Register, namely Jim Gamble though the CEOP mainframe connected to every police station crime files in the UK, the reference for this conviction still exists in the judiscial reference files and confiemes that Gerald P McCann was placed on the Child Sex Offenders Register following conviction in court, and is still on that register today! .

Much more than that I don't feel it's necessary to post; principally because there are mountains of stuff to be had by searching the net:

Gerald McCann CATS system registration number 19309

Failing a Google search, you could do worse than paste these URLs into your browser. It is the comments that are of much interest as anything else, and of course, those by KaOssis.

http://mccannexposure.wordpress.com/2010/09/05/peadophile-ring-with-link-to-madeleine-mccann-jailed/

http://jillhavern.forumotion.net/t1354-gerald-mccann-cats-system-registration-number-19309

There are just three issues in this hypothesis that I would like to mention, the first of those being importantly, the date that the, CATS system registration number 19309, was registered. That date having to be pre-March 2007 to have any significance.

Secondly, irrespectively of date; why is the file empty?

And thirdly, Gerry McCann's claim that he had is wallet stolen, or more importantly, his credit card. Because if we are to attach the same significance to the missing credit card that the writer does, I.e. McCann had to show that his credit card had been in a third party's possession, should various nefarious online activities concerning said card, ever come to light.

Because there has to be some significance to the credit card, why else would McCann come out with a tale of such incredulity surrounding the 'stolen wallet' that it makes the claim that Madeleine was abducted, almost plausible?

Gerry McCann has his wallet stolen. A day or two later it is returned to him, I'm not sure how, returned to him sans Pounds Sterling, but complete with credit cards and thirty Euros.

I'm going to have a Bill Maher moment here, and say; Imagine the balls it takes, to stand in front of another human being and tell them that?

Because let's face it, you believe that? Then not only do I have a bridge to sell you, I have a river full of bridges that I want to sell you.

Oh! and by the by, I think this must be the thirty Euros in question. The wallet saga. & more wallet saga.

Further reading: Gerry McCann AND the stolen wallet.

Saturday, 21 August 2010

Gery McCann Quote of The Century

This small extract, from this recent post, worthy you might agree, of it's own dedicated place in history. But actually it came from this slightly longer post, A Blight on Humanity Having just re-read the comments on that post it would appear that about these few words, I felt exactly the same then as I do now.

Well you would wouldn't you?


And this man has supporters!


“Without doubt, Madeleine will have suffered as a result of the negative effect this book and DVD will have had on the search for her." - Gerry McCann



Searching.

Saturday, 3 April 2010

A Blight On Humanity: Gerry McCann

The result of a much needed and long overdue throw out of all the rubbish I have saved over the months is a pot pourri of bits and bobs that would be better for being aired rather than being hidden away and forgotten.

As with many things that cross our path, particularly when times are hectic and there is lots happening all around, I think we tend to miss much, and it is only in retrospect that we can fully appreciate the content and the implications behind what has been previously said, written, or laid before us.

That said, it doesn't apply to me in this particular case, I wouldn't have saved the relative passages had it been so.
From the very off, as soon as I heard the words and had them confirmed in black and white some short time later, the full implication was all too apparent, as it was equally all too disgusting; a total affront to decency.

I have no wish to highlight any of the more loathsome parts of what was uttered by this vile creature, all I ask is that you read the thing slowly and appreciate the true horror and enormity of what this abomination of a man is saying.

Read it slowly, and perhaps as you do so, you might spare a thought for the girl that once had this reptile for a father.





"Freedom of speech should not include distortion of the truth, lies, fabrication and slander," said Kate McCann on Friday.

Gerry McCann added: "The key thing here is we're here to fight for our daughter, and if anyone steps over the lines then they should be prepared to defend what they say in court."

“We are pleased with the Judge’s decision preventing further distribution and sale of Mr Amaral’s book and DVD –‘The Truth of the Lie’.

“Mr. Amaral’s central thesis has no evidence whatsoever to support it. To claim as he did, that Madeleine is dead, and that we, her parents, were in some way involved with her disappearance, has caused our family incredible distress and it continues to do so.

“Without doubt, Madeleine will have suffered as a result of the negative effect this book and DVD will have had on the search for her.

“Sean and Amelie need protection too from such awful claims.

“Hopefully this injunction today will go a long way towards reducing further unnecessary and unjust distress to us all and allow people to concentrate completely on what is important - finding Madeleine,” the statement read.

“There’s one thing that has been revealed in the case files which is that there is no evidence that Madeleine is dead and there is no evidence to suggest that Kate and I were involved in any theories. It’s about Madeleine. As her parents, I hope people understand that we have to do what we are doing.”

In a statement after his participation, McCann asserted that, although there was no advancement in the investigation, there is also “absolutely no indication that she suffered any hurt or harm, therefore we must believe that she is alive out there and we cannot stop looking for her”.

“As parents, it is our obligation to continue searching for her; we must convince people that the searches must continue, and we should return to Portugal”, he said.







On a slightly lighter note, saved for it's contribution to that of which I am so fond, common sense.


By Bestbefore

The other great difference between the truth and a lie is that the truth is usually simple and a lie is invariably complicated.

"We went out to dinner leaving the kids most nights and we came back and they were still there" is really simple.

As is, unfortunately, "We went out one night leaving the kids but one of them got out of the apartment and fell off the balcony". Or, "We went out one night leaving the kids and we got back and one of them had had a serious accident". Or, "We went out one night leaving the kids and we got back and one of them had got out and been run over by a car."

The alternative is somewhat more complicated: "We went out one night leaving the kids, not realising that we'd been watched by a predatory paedophile for several days, who we hadn't noticed, despite the resort being quiet and despite the fact that we felt it was safe to leave the kids, who targeted Madeleine rather than the other kids because she was special, who got into the apartment between our checks, despite the fact we'd doubled the frequency from the night before following the crying incident, which we can't recall happening, avoiding being noticed by Gerry, who was talking to Jez, on the other side of the road to that claimed by Jez and Jane, who wasn't seen by Jez or Gerry anyway, just before she saw the abductor, who must have gone out through the window, despite no-one noticing it open and without leaving any marks, because the door slammed when Kate went in, and it's odd about those dogs, but Kate had handled dead bodies when she went to work in her holiday pants and took the cuddle cat, and anyway the twins' sandals were in the boot of the car with the nappies and the rotting meat, but we're totally confident in each other's innocence and our legal and PR team are too."





No prizes for guessing these were filed under the "Mantra" heading, probably taking no more than a few minutes in the gathering.

What a loathsome piece of shit he is.



There is absolutely no evidence that Madeleine has been seriously harmed and therefore, as her parents, we have to believe that she is alive,
and out there, and we cannot give up looking for her."


It will be clear to everyone now, that there is absolutely no evidence that suggests Madeleine has been seriously harmed. 15 08 2008


-There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Madeleine has been harmed. blog 30 08


"There is absolutely no evidence that Madeleine is dead or has been seriously harmed," times march 08


'There is absolutely no reason to believe that she is not alive.'


I think it's partly fact in that there is no evidence at all to suggest Madeleine had come any harm.
-oprah


It will be clear to everyone now, that there is absolutely no evidence that suggests Madeleine has been seriously harmed. Knowing this, we there is absolutely no evidence to suggest Madeleine has been seriously harmed. It's fundamental - without that evidence she's alive and the search is ongoing."18/5/09


"As far as Kate and I are concerned, there is no evidence to suggest that Madeleine is dead. 14/9/07


.....strongly believe that Madeleine is out there and can be found. blog 14/8/08






Woodward wrote

In my opinion, Jim Gamble is being used to threaten any would be dissenters, letting everyone know that Gerry is still in total control of the UK police and all their investigations. How bizarre that given that Madeleine's fate is still unknown, senior policemen are sharing a platform with the statistically most likely person to know her fate and the the last person to see her alive. Even if one is convinced of the parents innocence it is an inexplicable way for a police officer to behave.



Ain't it just Woodward, ain't it just.

And again.

Woodward

There is no "presumption" of abduction, even according to the conclusion report by the compliant shelving DA. I am truly astonished that Jim Gamble and his colleagues are not familiar with the investigations conclusions but appear to have accepted the McCann's version of the report's conclusion ,very sloppy.


Perhaps more astonishing than sloppy.


Without doubt I could fill pages and pages with the writings of those that comment on this case, but these are product of the previously mentioned clear out in but one corner of the garage.
I would dearly love to get my hands on, and pick the cream out of, the writings of Prof Moriarty, alas I fear, lost forever.

Thursday, 11 February 2010

You're At It Again Sunshine




He said: “What we would like is a panel to sit down and review the entire case – the evidence from all the different forces and all the evidence gathered by them.

“We would like anyone to do this – the best people available.

“It needs everyone to work together.”


And he wonders why people would like to kick him in the bollocks, and that's just the gals!



h/t Jo

I assume there will be a transcript for this short clip available as and when, but you can catch bollocks talking bollocks in the last few seconds.

I shall accept nominations for members of McCann's panel in the comments.

My blog so first bagsy to me, and just to show what a sterling fellow I am, I shall not, preferring as I do to leave that to another, choose our Stuart call me Stu of Leicester plod, but rather his ex boss, that fine upstanding man of faith, head of the Christian Police Association, McCann protector and conspirator, Matt, I'm a Christian, Baggott.





Saturday, 6 February 2010

I'm Glad You're Not My Doctor McCann


You look somewhat unbalanced if you don't mind me saying, not to mention a tad mad about the eyes.





















Does anybody know the story behind the last one in the series, looks like there might be something interesting in the telling?

Images courtesy of Joana Morais.

Sunday, 31 January 2010

Why Do These Killers Remind Me Of Gerry McCann?




It must be because they sound exactly like him, I cannot think of any other reason.

Unless it's the acting of course, yes it could be that, but then maybe it's a bit of both. What do you think, same lines-same acting?

This then, in one place and with my emphasis, the transcript from: "Why Do Killers Speak Out?"

~ ~ ~



Scott Peterson Transcript..

At this point unfortunately, it has reached a point where suspicion of me, is keeping people from searching for Laci.

Its lost that um there focussing on me, we need to ask people when was the last time they really though about Laci missing? as opposed to when the suspicions
that swirl around me. Currently um its important that we get people out there looking for Laci again.

There's some very simple things um obviously, yes, I had a.. relationship that was inappropriate and unfair to a lot of people and I apologise to everyone involved in that,,to all the families. it had nothing to do with Lacis disappearance.

(Change voice...weepy)
She knows how much she's loved , how much she's missed and be strong and we're working to get you home.

Question..You haven't given up?

S:P: No, I'm definitely not giving up.

Question..How much difficult does that get after...(can't hear)

S.P. Everyday,its more and more difficult. But, imagine, how difficult it must be for her. She's... so please volunteers anything possible help her. Thanks..(inaudible) Thank you.


Susan Smith Transcript.

I want to say to my babies, that your mama loves you so much and your daddy and this whole family loves you so much and you guys have to be strong.

Hey, I mean they've got people everywhere looking for them. I mean you know you can hear the helicopters in the area.
Um..but they haven't seen anything. Its just crazy and its been since 9 o'clock last night...You know and I,I, really thought that when it got daylight they would find them within a heartbeat but all I'm doing is just praying. I'm just keeping my faith that there gonna be O:K:


Mark Hacking. Transcript.

I woke at about eight recognised that she hadn't awakened me when she came home from running. Um but didn't think much of it ..she often does that if I'm tired or something so that out of respect I guess just let me sleep. Um..and I
often drive her to work. Today, she wanted to drive herself and then I called her at about 10o'clock just to say Hi and see how she was doing..
(Breaks down)

and they told me...I'm sorry...she never made it in this morning.


Former Profiler.

Question by D.A.

Clint, your a former profiler. I got to believe that these people have experienced things in their past where they've been able to get away with it. They've been able to lie and talk their way out of things and thinking that they just maybe able to just do it again.

Profiler.

Yes, your right Dan. I mean you know the shrinks will say you know , these people we have just looked at are narcissistic sociopaths. You and I will say these are people who have lied in their lives. They've lied about little things and they've gotten away with it and Dan that's been a pattern of behaviour when they need a reason , when they need an excuse, they lie.

In the past, people bought it..all of a sudden now people don't buy it..and they don't understand because they've gotten away with it for years.

D:A:

Monica, what's interesting is you can compare Drew Peterson with some of the people we just saw...he's not shedding tears he is almost, is saying, hey look I need a lawyer..Somebody out there get me a lawyer and then he goes around insulting his missing wife.

Monica

Dan,its about arrogance or innocence. So, either go and do this interview to profess their innocence or they do it because they are arrogant and narcissistic and want the attention. Here, look at him he's saying come here I've got a really big case. I need help. Come, pay attention to me and give me legal services for free..'Are you kidding me?'


Host D:A:

But, Monica do you think he's just going out with a final Swan song? I mean, even when he's proclaiming his innocence he's not doing it with any great fervour. I mean its almost, like well. I don't know what happened but you know what. My wife, when she was menstrual, would be a big problem. I mean you know right that's kinda what Drew Peterson was saying.

Monica

Well,what he's doing is basically ..he's putting down his wife. He's saying how horrible they were. How materialistic they were and he's the good guy here. End.